As per reports Malayalam actor Prithviraj is getting married to BBC World journalist Supriya Menon. The couple have been meeting since over a year now and are tying the knot today in Palakkadu. After the traditional wedding, there will be a grand reception in Thiruvananthapuram for the film industry and fans.

http://www.annauniv.edu/

http://www.squarebrothers.com

http://sivajitv.com/AnnaunivLogin.jsp

http://tamilnadu.schools9.com/anna083.htm

http://results.squarebrothers.com/anna-university-results/nov2008/

Good Luck!

httpv://in.youtube.com/watch?v=1YVb1_TBWXQ

The move to launch youtube in India could be because India is a big and growing market of Internet users and anything from Google is widely cherished by Indians. It would be stupid if any political or religious nut head would question on the launch and would want to create and issue out of this. We all know what all can happen in India.

As far as the strategy of the company goes for the launch specific to India I don’t think I’d comment on that.You can access the Indian version of Youtube at Youtube India.

I am not sure if these statements are an effort to curb the problem of identity crisis that Mr Bush and his official are suffering from. Probably they are too worried about the declining value of dollar and are frustrated and make such comments. The good thing for US government would be to look at factors internally which might be causing the dollar crisis.

I am no expert in talking about economic factors and factors that affect the inflation in a country, but I think if one were to think logically, then the best solution is to clean your house first and then think about cleaning the locality. Perfectly applies to Mr Bush!

How about considering the per capita consumption of oil in US and in India. Commonsense! India in the so called words is a developing country and hence the need for products and service is bound to grow. For US the so called developed country they are already developed and they should find a way to reduce their consumption of oil. I am sure without having support from studies I can say that the consumption of oil in US is going up by every year. If US boasts to be a developed economy, then they should find ways of curbing their dependence on oil.

My remarks are entirely towards the childish statements of My Bush and his government and not to US as a country. I don’t think I deserve a right to question the people of a country. So next time Mr Bush and his officials should think a little before they speak.

If there was a better so called E-Commerce Report, it has to be the one published on NewYork times dated 24 April 2008. A complete misunderstanding of user behavior and importantly user’s knowledge. The post titled A New Tool From Google Alarms Sites, talks about a new feature that Google launched called search with in search to help the so called big players on the net to combat their identity crisis. However, the bigger crisis is not that nytimes chose to make this a story (I fully appreciate the FYI nature of the news), the bigger crisis is the fact that the news post is written trying to suggest that the users are dumb not to understand a phenomenon like the one it emphasizes on.

My point is people are making too much of the fact that Google has launched a service that has greater SEO impact than Google itself would have imagined. But to place an argument on baseless assumption has become the norm of today’s journalism. The feature that Google has launched is

This month, the company introduced a search-within-search feature that lets users stay on Google to find pages on popular sites like those of The Washington Post, Wikipedia, The New York Times, Wal-Mart and others. The search box appears when someone enters the name of certain Web addresses or company names — say, “Best Buy” — rather than entering a request like “cellphones.”

If I could use an image to depict what is the point nytimes is trying to make, it would look something like this:

What you are seeing is the result of a query nytimes on Google and the first result is of course the official nytimes website. But what is interesting (at least nytimes is trying to prove it to be interesting) is the fact that there is small little search box to search with in the site. How about a little knowledge of something called as “Google’s Query Modifiers”. If nytimes was a little more informed about this they would not have tries to sensationalize the story. But, I guess we all are the prisoners of journalism.

This feature in Google has always existed and if you would have wanted to search something within a site (not just necessarily the so called popular sites only), you could simply use the search query along with site: as a query modifier. I cannot imagine people have time for such crap and in fact even indulge in an argument to make a point. How about some sense of respect to user’s understanding of Internet and the world of web.